header image

9 Business Speak Cliches to Abolish

Posted by: Owen Lystrup | June 23, 2007 | 8 Comments |

– from Veer.com

Something about the business world makes me cringe sometimes. It’s the way people speak, especially to clients.

It reminds me of something I read in Stephen King’s ‘On Writing’ quite a few years back. He basically said it takes real talent to write simply. Not simplistically, but simply so people can understand and you don’t sound like a dunce. I think the same is true for how you speak. To me, using cliches like those below don’t make me feel that I’m more professional or well-spoken. Instead it makes me feel like I’m trying to prove to someone that I’m articulate, professional and well-spoken. The problem is, a lot of these cliches don’t even make much sense.

So here’s a list of my favorite oldie but goodies. If you use them, it doesn’t mean you’re a bad person, just a bit lazy and perhaps in too much of a rush.

Moving forward; adj (perhaps an adverb?) – Describes the future. Usually placed at the end of a sentence that contains an “action item,” see below. Eg., “I think coverage in these regional publications will prove very useful moving forward. – Thrown in at the end there, it doesn’t seem to add much of anything to the statement does it? I’m not entirely sure I know what it means.

One Off; adj. – I’m actually not entirely sure about this terms entire meaning. It may be colloquial, as I had never even heard it until I moved to San Francisco. I even had someone try to define it for me, and she couldn’t do it. escribes an instance where something happens only once. It’s meaning seems to stretch quite far, much like the F word. Eg., “This is just a one-off benefit that happens occasionally.”

Same page; noun – One of my least favorites. I loathe this term. It refers being on the same level with someone, in a consensus or that you are thinking in the same mindset. Eg., “I just wanted to make sure we were on the same page before I make the call.”

Touch base; verb – This is the most egregious of all business speak terms. It’s the “I Just Called to Say I Love You” of business speak. Loathe is just too soft of a word for it. It should be abolished with extreme prejudice. It usually means to follow up or check in with someone on something you have already contacted him/her about. Eg., “I just wanted to call and touch base with you to see if there was anything else you needed for your article.”

Best; noun (in this instance) – A salutation. In this case it’s used at the end of an e-mail as a closing. I think, however, it not only adds absolutely nothing to your e-mail, it also shows your unconscionable and extortionate laziness. Is it so hard to put a word like “regards,” “wishes” or any of the other obligatory and perfunctory business terms at the end of your e-mail? I prefer to get more creative and basic with my e-mail closings and add, depending on the context, salutations like “kind regards,” “with gratitude,” “take care,” “all the best,” etc. This one word, a solitary adjective no less, adds nothing to your message.

Shoot; verb – Usually used with “an e-mail.” This one is far less egregious. At least it tries to be cooler than saying, “send you an e-mail.” But why not stretch that a bit further and add something more creative? “I’m going to catapult you an e-mail,” or, “I’ll flick you off an e-mail later today,” or “I’ll bazooka you an e-mail this evening” (my personal favorite). Since when did “shoot” become a standard for describing how one will send an e-mail? Saying you’re going to shoot me an e-mail makes me want to shoot you in the face with a flare gun.

Straight-forward; adj. – Describes something that is self-explanatory or uncomplicated. This one as well is not so bad. But again, we can be much more creative about it. Or a better idea, just say “simple.” Eg., “This report should be pretty straight forward.”

Attached please find; verb – Usually at the beginning of a report or e-mail. Directs the reader to refer to an attachment. This one makes my soul throw up a little bit when I read it. Not that it’s grammatically wrong, but it doesn’t make much logical sense does it? Please for the love of God and all holy just say you’ve attached something to an e-mail. No need to church up an already and wholly unimportant aspect of your e-mail. Most e-mail programs have constructed cute little pictures (usually a paperclip) to show that there is an attachment. Telling the reader there’s an attachment is just a courtesy, but it by no means needs to sound so tight-assed.

PR; verb – Please do not ever use PR as a verb. It usually replaces “promote.” Eg., “This has been a great outcome. We should PR this to management.” If you’re trying to say that you need to make your efforts known, just use promote or flag or celebrate or any other word that would fit. PR is not a verb. Ever.

If you use any of these cliches, don’t worry. I do too. But some self-correction, a little less auto-pilot and some creativity can make your e-mails, speech and writing so much more personable.

If you have some stinky business-speak cliches, feel free to share them.

**Update** – For more great cliches to abolish immediately, check out Tom Mangan’s blog here.

under: Career Advancement, Content and Copywriting, PR Services, PR Students, Public Relations, Workplace, Workplace Issues, Writing, work

Responses -

“End to end” is one that I have been hearing a lot recently.

Another (I’m guilty of this too) is using PR as a noun to describe someone who works in PR, as in “I was at this press conference and this PR came up to me and gave me a press release.”

Solution, proactive, etc.

But don’t get me started. There are hundreds of words that should be banned.

I so enjoyed reading your blog. I am the editor of a working women’s magazine in South Africa. I was wondering if I could use some of your content and ideas here to create a “business speak” crossword puzzle.

Let me know.

Rachel

“two bites of the cherry” is the classic in the apt office!

That’s so true, I believe that the more intelligent a person is the simpler language they are able to use. As while they probably know all of these long words, they understand that in order to get their point across they don’t necessarily need to use them. Allowing more people to read and understand their point of view.

Great stuff Owen. Another cliche I’m sick of is “At the end of the day…”

Lost touch for awhile, but I’ll be sure to visit more often, please do the same! Cheers, Leo

Your are so right, cliches are used so much sometimes we don’t even know they are cliches. Simplicity of language can often be learned best from someone who is well educated and has learned English as a second language.

Terms come into being because people need a short-hand to take care of routine business.

Cliches are phrases and terms that have become commonplace. Doesn’t mean they need to be expunged.

The desire to purify the language by eliminating words and phrases is dangerous. Read “Principles of Newspeak” for more insight.

Owen has all the makings of a doubleplus good duckspeaker. Long Live Big Brother!

Eschew obfuscation.

Points for trying anyway, Bob.

I like the reference to Orwell. The only part that doesn’t make sense is you seem to be advocating the use of cliches, which Orwell hated entirely.

Perhaps instead of getting wrapped up in a single essay, you should have read Orwell’s “Politics and the English Language.”

In case you are too lazy to do so, I’ll give you some help:

“As soon as certain topics are raised, the concrete melts into the abstract and no one seems able to think of turns of speech that are not hackneyed: prose consists less and less of words chosen for the sake of their meaning, and more and more of phrases tacked together like the sections of a prefabricated henhouse.”

If you search the entire essay, you will not find mention of cliche. This is because Orwell referred to them more correctly as “dying metaphors.” These are phrases used “without knowledge of their meaning,” and are a sign that “the writer is not interested in what he is saying.

If you use cliches, your language is lazy.

Period.

Leave a response -

Your response:

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

Categories